Patent Docs: Washington College of Law Post-Argument Discussion of Peter v. Nantkwest

law argumentOther college students worked with Bailey on the briefing and all of the analysis that went into it, but if they have been granted oral argument on the movement to unseal the paperwork, he must be the one to argue before U.S. District Judge Raner Collins.

Unless the Court directs otherwise, both sides is allowed one-half hour for argument. Counsel isn’t required to use all of the allotted time.

If it’s a valid consideration when applied to Cuba and the American homeowners of sugar estates and slaves there, it applies equally to all other international locations where American residents might have property; to China, Hindostan, or the Feejee Islands. It was no correct argument for the Spanish minister to urge upon the American Secretary of State. It was undoubtedly calculated and designed to affect his sympathy in the case–that sympathy with one of many parties which he says had become nationwide. It was calculated to excite and to influence the Secretary of State not solely by the effect to be produced within the island of Cuba, however maybe also by a regard to sure interests nearer home. But was that JUSTICE?

The solely precept to which half the courtroom adhered, and thereby left the decree of the Circuit Court unreversed was, that the Spanish prohibition of the slave trade had not quickened into life quite in time to avoid wasting these thirty-9 unfortunates from the clutches of their oppressors. contrary to the legal guidelines of countries, his choice was such … Read More

View More Patent Docs: Washington College of Law Post-Argument Discussion of Peter v. Nantkwest