Law School & Special Sessions

law argument

Oral Argument Workshop

To save the appearance of a violent and shameless outrage upon the authority of the judicial courts, the moment was to be watched when the Judge of the District Court should problem his decree, which it was anticipated could be conformable to the written opinion of the Attorney General. From that decree the Africans could be entitled to an attraction, first to the Circuit and ultimately to the Supreme Court of the United States–but with appropriate management, by one and the same operations they might be choused out of that right, the Circuit and Supreme Courts ousted of their jurisdiction, and the hapless captives of the Amistad delivered over to slavery and to dying. The second precept drawn by the late Attorney General, if he had reasoned on the topic as men should purpose, is in favor of the claims of the Africans. The Antelope was engaged in the slave commerce south of the Line, the place it was not then prohibited by the legal guidelines of Spain. The decision of the Supreme Court, such because it was, was in affirmance of the decree of the courtroom below.

Each concern also accommodates an extensive part of guide critiques. This six-week course titled Competing in Europe is the third in a collection of three exploring some of the main enterprise features of European Union law. Besides providing learners with a sound information base of European legal guidelines and regulations, the series explores business concerns within a broader perspective … Read More

View More Law School & Special Sessions

Oral Argument Legal Definition

law argumentWas that a floor on which courts of justice will determine instances? I belief not. This is what the logicians name argumentum ad hominem–an attraction, first to the emotions of the individual, not to his sense of justice. He then brings as much as Mr. Forsyth his personal building of the legislation of nations, as given in another case, which he deems analogous. Perhaps I may be justified in conjecturing to what case he alludes, and I will say that, if he alludes to any case of public notoriety, I shall be capable of present, before I shut, that there is no analogy to this case.

Views

I was just lately at a CLE with a group of local district court judges. One of the judges was asked what he likes to see from the attorneys who seem before him. He said that he likes it when attorneys ask him if he has any specific questions or points that he wants addressed before they start their feedback. I think that if you are as ready as Sam suggests, you must have the ability to address these questions, and then continue with your argument.

And indeed we argue that such is the case. Justice Alito pushed back by attempting to say that sexual orientation discrimination and intercourse discrimination are distinct ideas. But Pam Karlan, who argued the sexual orientation instances on our side, rightly identified that sex was all the time at play and that sexual orientation discrimination itself is an … Read More

View More Oral Argument Legal Definition

Who Sets The Rules? When Is It Real? And Other Big Questions On Impeachment : NPR

law argumentThat’s why the most voluminous discussions of govt privilege have are available memoranda by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel—rather than judicial decisions. The points raised by the Crown on appeal in Morgentaler v. The Queen from the acquittal of the accused were rendered moot when the Supreme Court of Canada declared the abortion statute (section 251 of the Criminal Code) to be unconstitutional. There was no want for the Court to debate either the problem of the usage of the “defence of necessity” or defence counsel’s “unhealthy regulation” argument. Nevertheless, Chief Justice Dickson found the “unhealthy regulation” argument of defence counsel, Morris Manning, Q.C., “so troubling,” he felt “compelled to comment” on it.

It includes authorized disciplines similar to Intellectual Property regulation (IP legislation), Competition law and particular branches within Public law, similar to public procurement and state aid. To describe his imaginative and prescient of daily life, Toulmin introduced the idea of argument fields; in The Uses of Argument (1958), Toulmin states that some features of arguments range from area to area, and are hence referred to as “subject-dependent”, while other elements of argument are the identical all through all fields, and are therefore known as “area-invariant”. The flaw of absolutism, Toulmin believes, lies in its unawareness of the field-dependent aspect of argument; absolutism assumes that every one aspects of argument are area invariant.

So extraordinary, so anti-judicial is each thing upon the information in this case of the Antelope, that the Supreme Court really didn’t know … Read More

View More Who Sets The Rules? When Is It Real? And Other Big Questions On Impeachment : NPR