What impression will our other Supreme Court victories have?
When you end your argument (or run out of time), thank the Court and sit down. Part of the problem is adapting to and considering the judges’ considerations, while discovering the time and alternative to still voice the important elements of your argument. during your argument, the judges can and will interrupt you with questions. Approach your oral argument as a dialog with, not a lecture to, the judges.
And indeed we argue that such is the case. Justice Alito pushed back by attempting to say that sexual orientation discrimination and intercourse discrimination are distinct ideas. But Pam Karlan, who argued the sexual orientation cases on our side, rightly identified that sex was always at play and that sexual orientation discrimination itself is an amalgamation of the distinct forms of discrimination faced by LGB individuals, for example. In the end, at least five justices, together with Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Gorsuch, appeared to indicate there have been affordable arguments that the textual content applies in such contexts. Well, it lastly happened.
Professor Bondy argues an issue relating to a surveillance program. At the time, Professor Bondy was with the Department of Justice, in the Appellate Staff. He is at present Senior Counsel in Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe’s Supreme Court and Appellate follow.
Join Lawyerist Insider
Any request for divided argument shall be offered by movement underneath Rule 21 and shall set out particularly and concisely why more than one legal professional should be allowed to argue. Divided argument isn’t favored. three.
Unless the Court directs in any other case, each side is allowed one-half hour for argument. Counsel just isn’t required to make use of all of the allotted time.