You’ll be inspired to contemplate the contribution different theories can make to thinking about up to date points. semiannually , peer-reviewed international journal printed by the University of Niš (Republic of Serbia). We publish high quality, refereed papers twice per year.
12. Local Government
How does it differ from different kinds of law? Where does international law come from? And, critically, how is it enforced? Secondly, we’ll analyse in more element a significant subfield of worldwide regulation – human rights. Here too, truths typically taken to be self-evident are, on nearer inspection, far more ambiguous.
Judging by media coverage, it might appear that the Prime Minister dominates the decision-making course of, dwarfing other institutions such because the Cabinet, Parliament and the judiciary. But does this impression mirror actuality? Does Britain actually have a system of ‘Prime Ministerial’ – or, as some commentators have claimed – even ‘Presidential’ government? The module attempts to answer these essential questions via case-studies of latest Prime Ministers and an examination of the sources of Prime Ministerial energy, similar to the power to nominate ministers, to influence public opinion and to shape Britain’s overseas coverage.
Bachelor of Arts Government (Politics, Economics and Law)
This module aims to develop a important understanding of Constitutional Law. The course seeks to problematise the legitimacy of the constitutional preparations of the UK. A contextual method is adopted which entails drawing upon historical, political, comparative and jurisprudential supplies. The module will continually question whether or not Constitutional Law features as a … Read More
View More What is the relationship between political science and regulation? How do they differ from each other?
That’s why the most voluminous discussions of govt privilege have are available memoranda by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel—rather than judicial decisions. The points raised by the Crown on appeal in Morgentaler v. The Queen from the acquittal of the accused were rendered moot when the Supreme Court of Canada declared the abortion statute (section 251 of the Criminal Code) to be unconstitutional. There was no want for the Court to debate either the problem of the usage of the “defence of necessity” or defence counsel’s “unhealthy regulation” argument. Nevertheless, Chief Justice Dickson found the “unhealthy regulation” argument of defence counsel, Morris Manning, Q.C., “so troubling,” he felt “compelled to comment” on it.